‘Developing’ and ‘developed’ countries, ‘industrialised’ and ’emerging’ economies, ‘global north’ and ‘global south’, ‘majority’ and ‘minority world’ – there are lots of different ways of categorising the world, some of them more useful than others. One thing that they have in common is that there are only two categories. Whatever the nuances of those various terms, they basically boil down to ‘rich’ and ‘poor’.
The use of ‘middle-income’ countries notwithstanding, we seem to lack shorthand categories that reflect the reality of the world’s spread of income. We had lectures about this when I was an International Relations student, and they still haven’t really been resolved.
Hans Rosling argues that there are four categories to keep in mind. The world’s seven billion people can be mapped across four income levels:
There are essentially a billion people in extreme poverty, on $1-2 a day. The next step up begins at $4 a day, and 3 billion people live at this stage. There’s no doubt that it’s a very big step up from level one, but we shouldn’t kid ourselves that people at level 2 are no longer poor.
Between $8-$32 a day we have level three, and it is here that people begin to get water on tap and stable enough electricity to run a fridge. Two billion people are at this level.
Finally, there are a billion people at stage 4, which is likely to include you and I.
With those definitions of ‘middle income’, it might seem that we’re still talking about rich and poor, but the jumps in lifestyle that happen between the levels are significant. You can explore what they mean in practice through Gapminder’s Dollar Street project.