business shopping sustainability

What to make of the Sky Diamond?

F Scott Fitzgerald, best known for The Great Gatsby, published a novella in 1922 called The Diamond as Big as the Ritz. It tells the story of a family who own a mountain that is made entirely of diamond, and the lengths they go to in order to protect it. One of the ironies of the story is that while they possess something inordinately valuable, it is only worth anything if diamonds remain rare. If the world knew that there was a mountain-sized diamond out there, the value of all existing diamonds would collapse.

I was reminded of this story by the news that a company has made diamonds out of carbon in the air, indistinguishable from the ones extracted from the ground but with negligible environmental impact. And if you can make diamonds out of the air, what is that diamond worth?

Manufactured diamonds aren’t a new thing. As soon as scientists estabished that diamonds were carbon, people have been trying to make them – a less dubious form of alchemy. Methods were developed from the 1940s onwards, with various industrial applications. Making actual gemstones is more recent. It only became commercially viable quite recently, triggering panicked lobbying efforts from established firms such as De Beers to protect their ‘natural’, ‘real’ diamonds. They have failed, not least because ‘real’ means extracted from the dirt and plundered from Africa. From a small base, manufactured diamonds are growing fast and prices are falling.

What’s different about Sky Diamonds is that the idea has come from carbon capture first, another leftfield idea from a man with a history of them, Dale Vince of Ecotricity. “Some years ago, I was thinking about the concept of geoengineering as a way to extract carbon from the atmosphere” he says in his new autobiography, which I’m reading at the moment. “That led me to think about how to store that carbon, and to the simple thought that the most permanent, enduring form of carbon – the toughest of all – is a diamond. I wondered if it might be possible to take carbon from the atmosphere and turn it into diamonds.”

The process they use takes a diamond ‘seed’, and grows a diamond from it using layers of carbon vapour in a furnace. They are ‘sky diamonds’ because all the key elements come from the sky – CO2, hydrogen electrolysed from rain water, and the energy to run the furnace from wind and solar power. The company aren’t making any big claims about how much carbon they can lock away: they describe it as ‘modest’. But the process is being reported as carbon negative and zero impact.

Compared to the huge impact of mined diamonds, it’s a dramatic improvement. It’s a big step forward on the ethical front too, and a growing number of buyers are choosing manufactured diamonds for ethical reasons. And perhaps one of its biggest contributions will turn out to be in marketing. The idea of ‘sky diamonds’ frames manufactured gems in a new way, highlighting the benefits of the process rather than being somehow embarassed that they’re not ‘real’ ones dragged out of the ancient muck. That might preserve the romance that many people find in diamonds, and take it in a new direction for the 21st century.

So it will be interesting to see what becomes of Sky Diamonds, and whether it can actually put a dent in the polluting and exploitative industry. Dale Vince seems to suggest that’s where he wants to go: “This is green technology as it needs to be – sustainable, ethical and fun. Our next campaign will be to end diamond mining.”

  • I’ll review it shortly, but if you’re so inclined you can get Vince’s book Manifesto: How a maverick entrepreneur took on British energy and won from Earthbound Books.

5 comments

  1. Dale Vince is great at catchy marketing, and it’s nice to see in many ways. However I think we should be aware it has basically no chance of making any significant dent in the existing synthetic diamond trade, which is dominated by players, with big capital and R&D knowhow, like Element6 (a subsidiary of de Beers, surprise surprise). ‘Sky diamonds’ must be a version of chemical vapour deposition, and any existing manufacturers could swap existing cheap methane sources for renewably sourced (but currently a lot more expensive) methane. I’m not clear how Dale’s intervention will help here?

    We should also keep things in perspective:
    Global CO2e emissions: ~10,000,000,000 tonnes pa
    Global diamond production ~30 tonnes pa

    My concern here isn’t to knock Dale Vince’s efforts, or any media reportage, but that we should keep our focus (and whatever we can do as ‘our bit’ to support), on the activities that will make a truly substantial difference in the precious few years we have to turn around our truly massive addiction to burning hydrocarbons. That must mean doing whatever we can to pressure the giant users: cement, steel, food growing,shipping, heating etc, to transform quickly. Dale has made a great contribution to inspire change in our electricity production. What could (and others like him) do if they turn similar attention to the ‘behemoths’ like those listed above?

    Perhaps the readership here could hold an informal contest, to come up with the best project proposal for Dale to front, and get the world to think more seriously about ???

    1. Yes, I think the PR message is in some ways the strongest element to this. I think it will make the biggest difference to the diamond industry, not the climate. And it may not be this particular company that reaps the rewards of people choosing a synthetic diamond.

      Having just read Vince’s book, I suspect that would be fine by him. He has a very ‘mission-driven’ approach to business, and isn’t afraid to pitch money into projects that break ground without returning a profit – the Nemesis electric car being perhaps the biggest example.

  2. What a great way to sequester carbon. Diamonds are forever!
    I’ve also seen that the Russians have huge quantities of diamonds in storage. I think 60 Minutes did a story on this many years ago.
    Diamonds are similar to paper money. They have value because we give them value.

  3. Although I find this a magnificent idea in its conception and aim I feel it will go the way of other beneficial schemes. It will either turn out to be false or the big players will somehow take all references to the idea and find a discrediting way to simply bury it to maintain their interest. Sad I fear but true.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: