books environment

Not the End of the World, by Hannah Ritchie

My son is currently working towards grade four in piano. If he gets down about his mistakes, I remind him of how hard those exam pieces felt when he tried them for the first time. He is learning and making progress, and all forms of progress exist in tension between what was and what will be.

That tension is easy enough to hold with small things, like building a jigsaw or repainting a room. But it seems to me that the bigger the issue, the harder it is to keep perspective. For something like global poverty or climate change, progress is measured over decades. It’s very easy for it to become invisible, especially if you’re coming in halfway through the story.

With the greatest respect, Greta Thunberg is a good example. “Some people say that we are not doing enough on climate change,” she told Davos in 2019. “But that is not true. Because to ‘not do enough’ you have to do something. And the truth is we are basically not doing anything.”

This is a common refrain in climate circles, that nothing is being done. For Hannah Ritchie, it was nearly enough for her to give up on her passion for the environment altogether. As an environmental geoscience student, every day was a deep dive into depressing trends and a world falling apart. It left her feeling helpless, and she started applying for jobs in other sectors.

What changed her mind was a presentation from Hans Rosling, the Swedish data scientist who hit late career Youtube fame for his striking explanations of progress. There was more to do of course, but the world was getting better and not nearly enough people knew about it. (See the book Factfulness) Rosling focused on social trends such as poverty and health. Ritchie wants to do exactly the same thing with environmental issues.

That’s the heart of her book Not the End of the World, which looks at progress across a range of important topics – air pollution, climate change, biodiversity, overfishing, plastic and more.

There’s often good news to report on these things. Total carbon emissions are rising globally, but per person emissions have peaked. As a data scientist, that gives Ritchie confidence that overall emissions will follow. She expects the peak “in the 2020s”. Fast enough? Sadly not. But it’s a long way from ‘nothing is being done’.

This often surprises people, Ritchie writes, and I find this in my own work. I have a little activity in my climate action workshops that gets people to estimate the trend in the UK’s carbon emissions. It’s very rare for anyone to know that our emissions have been falling for a solid 50 years. It’s an empowering discovery: we’re already halfway down the mountain, I tell them. Our task is to finish the job.

Not the End of the World makes this point again and again. Global deforestation peaked in the 1980s. Low carbon energy is now the most economic option in many contexts, making the case for itself in ways few people expected ten or fifteen years ago. Moving to these cleaner technologies will mean less mining and resource extraction, not more. Some of these things I know and have written about. Some I didn’t: did you know petrol car sales peaked in 2017?

As you’d expect for someone who works for an agency called Our World in Data, there’s no shortage of facts and figures, and calculations on what makes a difference and what doesn’t. I liked how each chapter outlines ‘where we are today’ on an issue, presents the solutions, and then has a section called ‘Things we should stress less about’. Like eating local food, for example, which matters far less than most people think. “Being an effective environmentalist might make you feel like a bad one”, Ritchie warns. “The societal image of sustainability needs to change.”

Some sacred cows fall, and there are lines in the book that will make more traditional environmentalists shudder. But unlike some authors I could name, Ritchie isn’t out to score points. As with Rosling, this is a book that is enthusiastic about possibilities rather than shaming people for their ignorance.

Neither is it naive in its optimism. Ritchie is honest about how much there is to do, but we mustn’t forget how far we’ve already come. Environmental debate so often revolves around breaking news stories and projections of the future. It’s only when we step back and consider the past too that we can put these things in context – and often that’s encouraging. As she writes, “If we take several steps back, we can see something truly radical, gamechanging and lifegiving: humanity is in a truly unique position to build a sustainable world.”

2024 will no doubt have its share of setbacks and bad news. I’d suggest Not the End of the World is the perfect book to start your new year reading on a hopeful footing, and you can pick up a copy from Earthbound Books.

10 comments

  1. I heard her talking to Robert on Fully Charged and was impressed with her optimism and the use of facts – an often under utilised resource!
    I have bought the book and look forward to reading it. It’s currently sat on the post-Xmas book tower in the front room!

  2. Wishful thinking quoting cherry picked “data”.

    Her grandmother’s footprint in 1920 was 11 tons of carbon dioxide per year and hers is only 5. That is a highly dubious claim. My grandparents had a very low carbon footprint. Much lower than mine. Two light bulbs on in the house maximum, no TV, a mantle radio, no refrigerator or heater, no motor vehicle, lots of walking, no plastic packaging., no phone, a vegetable garden, chickens, a water tank, an outside toilet, a small 3 bedroom home made of timber with a very low carbon footprint.

    By contrast, I have a vehicle, a computer, a TV, internet, mobile phone, etc.

    This sort of optimism flies in the face of the data. We haven’t even begun an energy transition according to the latest data from the latest global energy report, species are going extinct at 1000 times historical rates, the Amazon is drying out and has become a carbon source rather than a carbon sink.

    One of the fundamentals of dealing with a problem/predicament is to be honest about its nature and scope. Ritchie’s book simply doesn’t help. As Jason W. Moore and others have shown very clearly, the Capitalocene has created an exploitive world-ecology that easily accommodates such groups as Our World in Data because it does not challenge the foundations of the Capitalocene but ensures they remain firmly in place. Positivity may help people feel good but doesn’t change the data or facts or underpinning hegemonic ideology.

    1. I suspect you’re a different generation than Hannah, in which case it’s not a straight comparison. And if we’re talking about grandparents, what point in their life are we talking about? Mine had higher footprints than my own in the 90s and 00s, but almost certainly smaller ones in the 50s. So Hannah’s is a personal anecdote and not necessarily one to extend to everyone everywhere.

      As for positivity, I constantly find that those in the environmental movement don’t know about progress. It’s genuinely a blind spot, and it’s possible to point that out without denying the realities and dangers you rightly describe.

      1. Jeremy,

        What do you mean by “progress”? I am not in the environmental movement. I am a thinking retired enginner who is used to doing pedth analysis.I also lead courses in critical thinking. “Progress” is an interesting and unexaminaed word fiull of a particular ideology and world view. I look forward to your explanation, since we have had centuries of progress and the world is in a worse state now than it has ever been in., as the planetary boundaries project has clearly shown and earth system scientisits know only too well.

        1. I presume you’ve read the book, in which case you’ll know that Ritchie explicitly mentions how she almost burned out on the negativity of environmentalism, so it’s a reference to that, not to you. I’m aware of the complexities of ‘progress’, Ronald Wright’s book A Short History of Progress being a top recommendation of mine. But again, if you’ve read the book you’ll know what is being referred to – falling emissions, air pollution etc. Environmental problems getting better, essentially.

          I didn’t think the book was naive about how bad things are, but the people shouting ‘we’re all doomed’ often haven’t noticed those places where things are improving, and I thought Ritchie did a fine job of pointing those things out.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.