Get the jump on the churnalists

When I was a journalism student, I was taught how to write and investigate and check sources, how to structure a story and present information as dispassionately as possible.

I was also let into a little secret. There was a rather enlightening moment when I first started getting current press releases, writing articles, and then seeing those same stories in the press. I realised just how much of a press release would be used, often just tweaking the headline and the first sentence and then reproducing the rest wholesale.

And ‘wholesale’ it often is, since so many press releases are adverts in disguise, commissioned by companies to drum up conversation in their field. As readers, we don’t get to see the release. We rely on the journalist to do their job and look into it, get some balanced opinion, and give us the facts.

In a pressurised, fast moving age, the temptation is to skip the journalism and just churn out content. Press releases, while very useful, can be a tempting shortcut. One recent estimate suggests that 54% of news articles use some measure of PR content – giving rise to the term ‘churnalism‘. is a new website that aims to expose this phenomenon. Set up by the Media Standards Trust, the ‘churn engine’ is designed to spot PR. Simply paste in the copy and run the engine, and it will tell you what percentage of the article is copied and pasted from a press release.

“News organisations can now be much more transparent about the sources of their articles,” says Martin Moore of the MST, “but most of them still aren’t. Hiding the connection between PR and news is not in the interests of the public. Hopefully will nudge them to be more open about their use of PR material.”

1 comment

  1. Once again you are making a very valid point here. I am a member of the Union of Concerned Scientists which years ago researched company strategies to form (manipulate) public opinion, and the reality is even worse than what you portrayed here. It goes all the way to bought research and even fake institutions. But in the case of the press releases the companies cannot even really be blamed – it really is the job of the journalists to identify the sources and filter the content. But as you say: often that simply doesn’t happen for quite practical “real world” reasons. I also often saw press releases that I wrote appearing 1:1 as articles. Normally it should at least say “Source: XY Corporation”). I guess business administrators (of publishing houses, which also are corporations) would see this as a form of outsourcing and taking advantage synergy effects…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: