climate change current affairs politics

A budget to change the climate

Exxon-Mobil’s lobbying team, the coal industry, Fox News, the people who commissioned the stealing of the CRU emails – their moment has come. In three days time the US must agree its government budget, and this one could be historic.

This particular budget, drawn up by the majority Republican house, is notable for bringing the cuts bandwagon to the US. It’s also a systematic attempt to gut the country’s environmental protection safeguards, and strip funding from anything to do with climate change. No more funding for the IPCC or the UN Population Fund, for NOAA’s Climate Information Service, or the EPA’s greenhouse gas registry.

These proposals could hardly be more cynical, cutting funding from every climate body going. Even the White House climate change advisors have to go, and the UN’s head climate negotiator was sacked last week. It’s a deliberate strategy to force climate change off the agenda, and the US would essentially wash its hands of the whole issue.

Climate change is a charged debate everywhere, but it is unusually irrational in the US. There is scarcely a single Republican congressman who believes that climate change is caused by human activity, and wherever the party has a majority, no action on climate change is possible. And these budgets cuts clearly are ideologically motivated – the IPCC gets less than $3 million a year, peanuts in a budget of $3.7 trillion. It’s a high price to pay for partisanship.

The tragedy of couse is that the climate is bigger than US politics. The US accounts for a fifth of global CO2 emissions, which means that runaway climate change is inevitable without action from the US. Emissions must peak by 2015, and this budget is deliberately designed to prevent the US from taking action in the time frame required. In other words, this is a budget that seals the world’s climatic fate.

That sounds melodramatic, but I can’t see how it could be otherwise. If this set of proposals goes through, then it’s pretty much a matter of how bad climate change will be and how we can adapt, rather than whether or not it can be stopped. The skeptics and lobbyists might be celebrating, but bigger things are at stake this week than the US government’s operating budget.

1 comment

  1. The US are in so much debt, with no way of paying it off, along with a rapdily declining infulence in the world and major issues of energy scarcity that I think they know they can no longer even pretent to care about the environment.

    When oil is in short supply and they are desperate to feed their dirty habit then they are going to have to use increasingly dirty fuels, regardless of environmental or social costs.

    I do agree though that this is also ideologically driven; sadly their ‘head-up-their-own-arse-theory’ (read: neo-liberalism/fascism) is going to doom us all to an increasingly hostile future.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: