climate change equality social justice

Open letter: Ipsos, you missed a bit

Dear Ipsos,

I was interested to read the results of your recent survey on concern about climate change around the world. Thank you for taking the time to ask 23,577 people in 31 countries how worried they are about climate change.

However, I would like to point out a problem with the distribution of opinion. I made a quick map of the countries where citizens had an opportunity to take part in the survey, and those you didn’t ask:

Ipsos, you forgot to ask Africa.

Not entirely – I see that South Africa features. But you would never ask France, and expect the French to speak for all of Europe. Why should that be any different in Africa, with South Africa representing an entire continent of 54 countries and 1.4 billion people?

This is doubly important on the topic of climate change, because if we map the 20 countries most and least vulnerable to climate change, it looks like this:

Of the 31 countries you asked, 15 of them are among the world’s least vulnerable countries to the climate crisis. How many of the top 20 most vulnerable countries did you ask?

None.

Your Earth Day survey on ‘global attitudes to climate change’ is therefore heavily skewed towards countries that are far from the front lines of the climate emergency. (It’s also biased towards former colonial powers.)

I appreciate that running a survey is easier in Sweden or Switzerland than it is in Somalia or Sudan. But Africa is the continent most affected by climate change. You have left out the voices that most need to be heard.

If you were to ask, you would find that Africa’s climate story is as diverse and interesting as anywhere else. A story of disaster and increasing threat, from drought in Ethiopia to cyclones in Madagascar – but also of solutions, adaptation and resilience, from re-forestation in Senegal to bus transit systems in Tanzania to geothermal energy in Kenya.

I hope that you will be able to invest more in polling in Africa, and that next year’s survey will be more truly representative of what the world thinks about climate change.

4 comments

  1. Thanks Jeremy for pointing out the exclusion of African voices I have just asked Cat Jenkins to consider and link up between CATJ and democracy without borders again to include a global perspective from a world Parliament, also glad to see you are reading the Regenesis looking forward to your review regards mark

  2. A bit unfair Jeremy ?They are a global research company from the rich world for the rich. They are looking for i
    profit from research, not reality or real lives, let alone justice.
    Steven Peters
    Aotearoa

Leave a Reply to JM Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: